the following two statements should be valid, but cause syntax errors:

// a class definition that does something with things that extend PApplet
class Heythere<T extends PApplet>{
}

// method definition which can do things with papplet
public <T extends PApplet> void doSomething( T thing ){
}

interestingly it works in field definitions. this works just fine:
Vector<? extends PApplet> applets;

Awesome; thanks.

fixed.

wow... that was fast...
now i have to see if can find another way to break it :)